Monday, March 23, 2020

Antigone and Creon essays

Antigone and Creon essays Sophocles Antigone is a giant of classic Greek tragedy. It has inspired thought and emotion in readers and audiences for over 2400 years. Though the storyline seems simple enough, the plays plot drives home a wide array of universal human concerns. This is the main thrust of its timeless attraction. The story of Antigone is the story of the conflicts between Antigone and Creon, and through them the individual and the state, the physical and the metaphysical, free will and fate. Through archaic style and ancient history, these messages echo back to us still. Antigone and her rebellion against Creons dictates (as well as his reaction) set the stage for most of the plays symbolism. At first Antigone seems very clearly to be the main character, with Creon playing the antagonist to her protagonist. His actions can only follow from those of Antigone, so he cannot be the traditional protagonist like Oedipus in Oedipus Rex. But later in the play the line is blurred. The way his actions work and feed the conflict throughout make him fit the definition of a protagonist; the main character through whom the story flows. After Antigone's capture, the play centers on Creon and his decisions. Her addition to the conflict is all but spent. So both in turn provide the main contributions throughout the play. Another case of friction between the two characters is their view. One initially feels pity for Antigone because she is being sentenced to death for standing up for what she believes is good and right in the eyes of the gods. Antigone plays to the readers respect for her heroism, choosing to follow the laws of the Gods above Creons laws and punishments. "It is the dead, not the living that make the longest demands: we die forever...you may do as you like, since apparently the laws of the Gods mean nothing to you."(I.59-62), she accuses in an argument with Creon. Her democratic slant also puts her in good s ...

Friday, March 6, 2020

Intro Capitalism vs Communism essays

Intro Capitalism vs Communism essays Does a relationship flourish more when it is controlled or when it is free to grow on its own? The question of whether it would excel better as a controlled relationship or a free relationship also relates to the government's total control of economy through communism, in contrast with the "laissez faire"-style, free economy through capitalism. To decide which of these perspectives best meets the needs of citizens, issues such as quality of life, protection of individual rights, and which system would produce the most wealth for an economy need to be addressed. Communism is a perspective that focuses on state-control of the economy, classless society, economic equality, and public-owned private property. It would provide for a classless society in which all was shared equally. This concept appealed to many people, and during the late 1800's and early 1900's, socialist parties were formed to work towards the goals Karl Marx described. Some of the countries to follow suit were Ru ssia and China. Unfortunately, these developments may lead to extreme forms such as dictatorship, or suppression of individual rights. On the other side of the spectrum is capitalism, a perspective focused on private ownership of property, division of labour, competition, specialization and individual self-interest to increase production. Capitalism provides for an increased quality of life, as well as more opportunity for wealth and success. Unfortunately, government-free economies allow for some individuals to fall into poverty, resulting in a lower quality of life. Capitalism would clearly benefit a country, as it would provide far more advantages than communism, such as increased quality of life, protection of individual rights, and the opportunity for wealth. ...